Monday, 5 January 2026

And so begins a new year

Before setting off on this, the first blog post of 2026, I'd like to wish you all a happy new year and I do hope you've had a wonderful break between the end of 2025 and the beginning of 2026!

The bell tower of All Saints with Holy Trinity just after the ringing in of the New Year!
In 2025 I managed to post 68 blogs, covering a variety of topics ranging from commemorations - like 300 years since the birth of Robert Bakewell, 120 years of the Carnegie Library, the annual commemoration of the Zeppelin raid of 1916, and an alphabetical celebration of 100 years of the exhibition in Paris which gave its name to Art Deco. Also, there have been the usual 'So Who Was' posts - like John Thomas Judges, and William Thomas Cartwright - posts about buildings - like Burleigh Hall, and the Old Rectory - posts about connections - mostly with Agatha Christie - and a serialisation of Goadby's 'History Of Loughborough'. And then there were the posts about various events I'd attended, and the Heritage Open Days events I took part in. 

In August I wrote that the viewing figures for the blog were nearing a staggering and unexpected 1million! Since then, they have surpassed that figure and today are standing at 1,122,023! I can't thank you enough for being part of my readers! If, like many of us these days, you view the blog on your mobile phone you won't get the full experience of the blog - the web view has a pinned post, a list of all the blog posts, and clickable keywords. So, in order to make sure you don't miss a post, there is a complete list of all the blog posts I've written available from here: 'Links to All the Blog Posts in lynneaboutloughborough'. 

As you probably know, as well as working on the blog, I also lead guided walks, give presentations, contribute to projects that further our knowledge of Loughborough's history, and write books, the latest of which, 'Loughborough At Work' was published in September 2025.

2026 looks as though it's going to be as busy as year as previous ones, so I'm looking forward to that!

Wishing you well in 2026!

____________________________________

Posted by lynneaboutloughborough

With apologies for typos which are all mine!

_______________________________________________

Thank you for reading this blog.

Copyright:

The copyright © of all content on this blog rests with me, however, you are welcome to quote passages from any of my posts, with appropriate credit. The correct citation for this looks as follows:

Dyer, Lynne (2026). And so begins a new year. Available from: https://lynneaboutloughborough.blogspot.com/2026/01/and-so-begins-new-year.html  [Accessed 5 January 2026]

Take down policy:

I post no pictures that are not my own, unless I have express permission so to do. All text is my own, and not copied from any other information sources, printed or electronic, unless identified and credited as such. If you find I have posted something in contravention of these statements, or if there are photographs of you which you would prefer not to be here, please contact me at the address listed on the About Me page, and I will remove these.

External Links:

By including links to external sources I am not endorsing the websites, the authors, nor the information contained therein, and will not check back to update out-of-date links. Using these links to access external information is entirely the responsibility of the reader of the blog.

Blog archive and tags:

If you are viewing this blog in mobile format, you will not be able to easily access the blog archive, or the clickable links to various topics. These can be accessed if you scroll to the bottom of the page, and click 'View Web Version'. Alternatively, there is also a complete list of posts, which when clicked will take you to the page you are interested in.

Searching the blog:

You can search the blog using the dedicated search box that appears near the top of the blog when viewed in the web version. Alternatively, you can search using your usual search engine (e.g. Bing, Google, DuckDuckGo etc.) by following this example:

site: https://lynneaboutloughborough.blogspot.com/ “Radmoor House”

NOTE – the words you’re actually looking for must be in “” and the first of these must be preceded by a space

Thank you for reading this blog.

Lynne





      

Sunday, 28 December 2025

Goadby's History of Loughborough Chapter 6

Continuing with the story of Loughborough as presented by journalist Edwin Goadby back in 1864. In this chapter, Goadby discusses the mediaeval guilds. 

I've tried to keep the text and the layout as it appeared in the original newspaper serialisation, although have split some of the text into separate paragraphs to aid reading. I've added a few explanatory notes at the end, if I think these might be useful. In the 160 years since the original publication appeared, there have been many more discoveries and revelations about Loughborough's history, and some terminology will have changed, so some of the information contained in this article will be wrong: I have not tried to amend these in any way, so reader, beware!  

THE HISTORY OF LOUGHBOROUGH FROM THE TIME OF THE BRITONS TO THE MIDDLE OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY.

In: ‘Loughborough Monitor’, 19 January 1865, pg. 5

CHAPTER VI. THE GUILD OF JESUS AND ST. GEORGE.

____________________________________



Chapter VI Probable date of the Formation of these Guilds - Origin of Guilds - Their Three Classes - The Social and Religious Guild, its primary uses and organization - The Loughborough Guilds of this character - Their Salutary Moral Influence, as shewn by the rules of a similar Fraternity in London - Place of Meeting, etc. - The Riding of the George - Unfortunate destruction of their Documents.

Before continuing our account of the several noble members of the family of the Beaumonts who were successively manorial Lords of Loughborough, it is right we should pause for a time to notice an important feature in the religion and trade of the town which was developed sometime during the seigneuralty of the family, although at what precise date there exists no means of determining. We refer to the guilds established in the town sometime in the fourteenth century, most likely during the reign of Edward III (1327-99), when the system of guilds was greatly extended all over England, and playing an important part in the life and energy of the place during their continuance.

The origin of the guild-system in England and Germany has been the subject of many able and learned investigations, into which we regret that our space forbids us to enter. It must suffice, therefore, if we state, upon the high authority of Dr. Wilda [1], that the guild was originally a heathen banquet, and that the word still retains its significance as such in the Danish language. With the Anglo-Saxons it had also some-what of a similar meaning, although the word guild itself (from gyldan, to pay, to make good) was understood by them to mean a mutual contribution in food and drink, or in money, for some common social or religious purpose.

The early guild, as we have already stated in an earlier part of the history, was the foundation of most corporations or boroughs, and so was a political union; it was at first the voluntary and afterwards the compulsory association of different persons of the same trade or craft, and so became a species of Trade-union; and it was also a religious, charitable, and social fraternity. The religion of the time enforced the custom of masses and obits for the souls of departed persons, and while the wealthy endowed their chantries, as we have already seen that Hugh Dispenser did at Searlesthorpe [2], and bequeathed lands and money for the support of a private priest, the poorer classes were left to support each other by voluntary associations very much resembling our modern benefit sick-clubs [3]. Each individual of the locality, upon entering the guild, paid a given sum of money to the common fund, and made occasional and quarterly contributions as well.

The mass-priest elected by the guild sung a mass at every meeting for the living friends, and each brother two psalms. Psalms and masses were also sung at the death of a member of the guild, and fixed contributions were levied from each member for the benefit of his survivors and to defray the expenses of his funeral. If a man suffered losses in other ways, a similar method of relief was adopted. The guild was dedicated to some patron saint, and festivals were held upon his natal day. If a member absented himself from the meetings, unless by reason of sickness, he was fined so many masses, according to the statutes of the guild.

The Loughborough guilds were mainly of this social and religious character, although in the course of time they assumed the character of trade associations. The early Saxon gyld had lost its political functions in the manorial court, and the inhabitants appear to have been contented with that government for some considerable period. The establishment of the Guild of Jesus and the Guild of St. George was an evidence of the want of a closer and more reciprocal union for social and religious purposes. Besides the uses already enumerated, the guilds exercised a salutary influence over the general behaviour of their members. This is well seen in the rules of the Jesus Guild of London, from which we shall make an extract or two.

The officers of a guild we may premise were called wardens. Here is one that speaks for itself:

"If any of the company be of wicked fame of his body, and take other wives than his own, or if he be a single man, and be held a common lecheur, or contekour (a quarrelsome person), or rebel of his tongue, he shall be warned of the warden three times, and if he will not himself amend, he shall pay to the wardens all his arrearages that he oweth to the company, and he shall be put off for evermore. So that the good men of the company be not slandered by cause of him".

Provision was also made for such as "fel [fell] in mischief by sickness of body, or by robbery by land or by water, or by fire brennyng (burning), or by elde of body, or by contek (strife) he leese [lose] hand, finger, or other member of his body; wherefore he may not work and live of his craft; so that it be not at his assault, ne at his desert, but at his defence, by record of his neighbours. And if he have well and truly paid his quarte ridges [coins] and other things, as the good men of the company doen, he shall have of the silver of the quarte ridges of the Box every week, for terme of his life x pence halfpenny, in helpinge of his sustenance, he praying for all the company. And at his dying shall have the light and masses, as is beforesaid".

The discipline of the guild usually extended even further than the investigations which must always have determined these grants, and the exclusion of a notorious evil liver. The following rule of the same guild completes the picture of their social power and importance.

"And if any man be of good state, and use hym to ly long in bed, and at rising of (off) his bed, nay woll not work, but wyn (query—wane, or destroy) his sustenance, and keep his house, or go to the tavern, to the wyne, to the ale, to wrastling, to schetyng (shooting), and in this maner falleth poor, and left (i.e leaveth) his cattel (chattels) in his default for succour, and trust to be holpen by the fraternity, that man shall never have good, no helpe of companie, neither in his lyfe no at his dethe, but he shall be put off (out) for evermore of the companie".

These facts will show, we think, that we do not exaggerate when we ascribe considerable importance in every point of view to the establishment of these guilds. Each guild appears to have had its common hall. The one belonging to the Guild of Jesus stood, about where the premises of Messrs. Aslett and Dawson now stand at the bottom, or Cheapside, of the Market-place; whilst the one belonging to the Guild of St. George occupied the site of the now disused Assembly Room in the George Yard, which owes its name to the fact. We know nothing about the character of these buildings, but it was here the various members of the guilds assembled and transacted their special business. Hence too they sallied in procession to perambulate the principal streets of the town on their way to church upon the feast-day they especially commemorated. Various devices and banners, which the insignia of modern sick clubs are the representatives, were carried aloft in these yearly festivals.

The festival of the Jesus Guild was probably held on or soon after August 7, the feast-day of the name of Jesus, and would be a fine sight in those days. The church of St. Peters [4], as we have seen, contained various images around its walls, and these were pressed into service, along with such special ones as would always be prominent in the small side chapel set apart for the express service of the guild priest; and these formed the leading feature in the procession. Upon a moveable platform or car there was a large full-sized image of the Christ upon the cross surrounded by other figures, dramatised into a resemblance of the crucifixion. After the procession, the church-going and the special religious service, there would sometimes be the performance of a Mystery or miracle-play in the open Market-place. This was rude drama in which various scriptural characters conspiciously figured, and hell and heaven, devils and angels were grotesque represented. They were, in fact, nothing less than a sort of spiritual Punch and Judy Show, and many of the specimen mysteries that have come down to us are full of bad theology, bad versification, and execrable argument. However, they drew an audience much better than a long church-service, and no doubt many a by-stander got some kind of spiritual insight and help from them.

In honour of St. George, a similar custom was observed, called the "Riding of the George," which was usually observed on or about his saint-day, April 23. A large wooden image of the saint on horseback, clad in armour, with the dragon writhing and mouthing at his feet, was fixed upon a car, and form the prominent object in the procession. Occasionally a living personage on a living horse represented the saint. A long procession followed, the church-bells rang loudly, men, women, and priests gave picturesqueness to the throng, and the joy and gratulation of all made this one of the greatest holidays in the year. It was always a red-letter day in the local calendar, and observed as a public holiday long after the guilds had ceased to exist. In the middle of the seventeenth century St. George and the Dragon figures on the tradesmen' tokens of Robert Bannys [5], an important inhabitant of the town, and yearly payments were made by the churchwardens for ringing the church-bells upon April 23.

It is singular, and shows the carelessness and absorption of the men of the time in their daily round of duties and pleasures, that so little information should have come down to us respecting these two guilds. A considerable quantity of documents, of some importance from a social and religious point of view, must have been collected during their existence; rolls of payments, levies and fines; names of members, wardens, and chaplains, and numerous other facts that would have served to spice our papers with such quaintnesses and realities as would have reproduced the men, the customs, and the time, much more vividly than any description we can give, however eloquent, or any mass of facts our research might gather from the most scattered sources. Our readers will regret it, but not more than we do ourselves.

What has become of these documents we cannot conceive. They might be destroyed as useless by an incurious lot of vandals, sold to the bookbinders to be cut up for covers and backslips, or perhaps have contributed their quota of flame and heat to boil the kettle of some thirsty thief. All we can say is, they are not to be found, and a romantic and interesting chapter of local history must remain unwritten, or at best but blindly groped after by a hungry reader and a disappointed writer. We shall have to refer to these guilds again further on in our history.

____________________________________

NOTES

[1] Dr Wilda refers to Wilhelm Eduard Wilda (1800-1856) who wrote a book called ‘Das Gildewesen im Mittelalter’ (‘The Guild system in the Middle Ages’)

[2] Searlesthorpe refers to a Mediaeval hamlet and church, long since deserted, but which gives its name to the current Shelthorpe

[3] Benefit sick clubs - mutual aid societies that provided financial support to members during sickness.

[4] Church of St Peter’s is what we today call All Saints with Holy Trinity

[5] I have been unable to positively identify Robert Bannys: the closest I have come is someone called Robert Banis, baptised in Melton Mowbray in 1650, who was the son of Robert Banis

____________________________________

Links to earlier parts of the History of Loughborough

Chapter 1, Part 2 - continuing Loughborough in the time of the Britons, Romans, and Saxons

Chapter 2, Part 1 - Loughborough in the time of the Normans

Chapter 2, Part 2 - Loughborough in the time of the Normans

Chapter 3, Part 1 - the family of the Dispensers

Chapter 3, Part 2 - the family of the Dispensers

Chapter 3, Part 3 - the family of the Dispensers

Chapter 4



____________________________________

Transcribed and presented here with the kind permission of the British Newspaper Archive. https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/

____________________________________

Posted by lynneaboutloughborough

With apologies for typos which are all mine!

_______________________________________________

Thank you for reading this blog.

Copyright:

The copyright © of all content on this blog rests with me, however, you are welcome to quote passages from any of my posts, with appropriate credit. The correct citation for this looks as follows:

Dyer, Lynne (2025). Goadby's History of Loughborough, Chapter 6. Available from: https://lynneaboutloughborough.blogspot.com/2025/12/goadbys-history-of-loughborough-chapter.html  [Accessed 28 December 2025]

Take down policy:

I post no pictures that are not my own, unless I have express permission so to do. All text is my own, and not copied from any other information sources, printed or electronic, unless identified and credited as such. If you find I have posted something in contravention of these statements, or if there are photographs of you which you would prefer not to be here, please contact me at the address listed on the About Me page, and I will remove these.

External Links:

By including links to external sources I am not endorsing the websites, the authors, nor the information contained therein, and will not check back to update out-of-date links. Using these links to access external information is entirely the responsibility of the reader of the blog.

Blog archive and tags:

If you are viewing this blog in mobile format, you will not be able to easily access the blog archive, or the clickable links to various topics. These can be accessed if you scroll to the bottom of the page, and click 'View Web Version'. Alternatively, there is also a complete list of posts, which when clicked will take you to the page you are interested in.

Searching the blog:

You can search the blog using the dedicated search box that appears near the top of the blog when viewed in the web version. Alternatively, you can search using your usual search engine (e.g. Bing, Google, DuckDuckGo etc.) by following this example:

site: https://lynneaboutloughborough.blogspot.com/ “Radmoor House”

NOTE – the words you’re actually looking for must be in “” and the first of these must be preceded by a space

Thank you for reading this blog.

Lynne

Sunday, 21 December 2025

Goadby’s History of Loughborough chapter 5 part 2

THE HISTORY OF LOUGHBOROUGH FROM THE TIME OF THE BRITONS TO THE MIDDLE OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY 

Chapter 5, Pt 2 The family of the Beaumonts

In: ‘Loughborough Monitor’ 1 December 1864, pg 5

Pt 2 - The fourth Lord Beaumont and the Crusade against the Clementists - Joins John of Gaunt to recover Castile - Goes to the famous Tournament at St. Inglevere - Captain of Carlisle, &c. - Entertains Richard II at Beaumanor whilst the Court was at Nottingham and his Marshalsea at Loughborough - A Trial arising out of Court Etiquette - Second visit of Richard II to Beaumanor - His Hunting - Wickliffe, and William of Swynderby - Beaumont sent to France.

____________________________________

Henry, the third Lord Beaumont, has little or no history attached to his name, but his son John, by his marriage with Margaret, daughter of John de Vere, Earl of Oxford, was in every way a remarkable man. His father died when he was only nine years old, in 1370, and left him to struggle into notability by his own efforts. We first hear of him in one of those Papal wars which form so important a part of the history of earlier times. There was a schism in the Papacy. The election of the Archbishop of Bari to the Papal chair under the name of Urban VI, so incensed the Cardinals, that, after the first professions of fealty, they forsook the city, went through a form of excommunication against him, and elected Robert of Geneva as Clement XII. The pontifical war began in earnest. Anathemas and bulls were bandied about from one to the other like shuttlecocks.

England took the side of Urban, and in 1382-3, bulls were issued to all the Prelates in England, and the crusade was preached throughout every diocese. It was, no doubt, preached in St. Peter's Church [1], Loughborough, and some of the contributions of Lord Beaumont's tenants there helped to make up the 25,000 francs collected in England. Lord Henry Spencer, Bishop of Norwich, a descendant of the Dispensers whose history has already been given, was made commander, and the youthful Lord John Beaumont was one of the Champions of the Church who joined him, and solemnly swore to make war on the Clementists and on them only.

They entered Flanders, and when about to attack the town of Dunkirk, a council of war was held, and Lord Beaumont and Sir Hugh Calverley took the side of mercy. The Flemings, they said, had done no positive wrong to them, were, in fact, Urbanists like themselves, and ought to be treated fairly and honourably. An English herald was sent to inquire what Pope they obeyed, and the man was murdered before their own eyes immediately he arrived, and before he could deliver his message. This insult aroused them like a young soldier's first wound, and they caught all the maddening passion of war. They attacked the place and soon captured it.

The Crusaders were, however, subsequently alarmed by a powerful army under the King of France which came against them, and they took refuge in Bourbourg. Here, the young Lord Beaumont, with one hundred men at arms and three hundred archers, commanded a part of the town. After a bloody defence the town capitulated, and the English returned home, and were somewhat indifferently received on their arrival. No doubt some of Lord Beaumont's own archers from Beaumanor and Loughborough accompanied him in this campaign, and fought by his side in this valiant but unsuccessful defence. We say no doubt, but we might put it stronger. There was not then any system of military recruiting like that now in vogue, and each officer of note collected his own men from his own retainers and tenantry, and frequently made express agreement with the King as we shall see further on in our history.

Early in 1386 a magnificent expedition sailed from the English shore under John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster, also called King of Castille and Leon, to recover the Kingdom of Castille. Lord Beaumont joined the expedition previous to its departure from Plymouth, but his name does not figure much in the various sieges, although he is mentioned by Froissart [2] as one of the company who entertained the Duke of Portugal on his meeting Lancaster at the bridge of Pont de More, between Monccao [3] and Melgacco [4], the luscious description of which is in Froissart's best manner. When the army was disbanded on account of its general ill-health, Lord Beaumont returned home.

During his absence some individuals, jealous of his growing position and power, had begun to stir up an evil-feeling towards him in the King's mind, and he appears to have suffered a temporary banishment from the court upon his return, as a presumed evil counsellor to the King.

While the peace between England and France remained unbroken, three French knights, Sir Boucicaut the younger, Lord Reginald de Roye, and Lord de Saimpi, with the chivalry characteristic of their time, proclaimed that they would hold a tournament at St. Inglevere, near Calais, and engage to maintain themselves singly against all comers. The challenge created quite a sensation in England, and many knights accepted it. Lord Beaumont was one of them. He was the fourth knight who advanced to the lists on the opening day.

He "came forward," says Froissart, who calls him both Sir John and Sir Henry, and Lord both, with a carelessness peculiar to him, and which later historians have copied,  "and sent to have the target of Sir (Lord) Boucicaut touched, who was instantly ready to reply to the call, having not dismounted from the tilt with Lord Clifford. The Lord Beaumont did not manage his lance well, and hit Boucicaut on the side; but Sir Boucicaut struck him so full in the middle of his shield that it drove him to the ground, and continued his course. Lord Beaumont was raised up by his attendants and remounted. The Lord de Saimpi then presented himself, and they tilted two courses without hurt to either.”

In the year 1389, Lord Beaumont was made Admiral of the Northern Fleet and Warden of the Border Marches, or as he is styled, Captain of Carlisle. In the latter capacity he displayed his usual boldness. He made a raid forty miles into Scotland, engaging in alternate extravagances of devotion and hostility. He captured the town of Fowyke, and brought home much booty and many captives.

Circumstances of some importance in the history of the town happened about this time. Richard II was making one of his royal progresses from London to York, in 1387, and established his court at Nottingham Castle. During this time his Marshalsea was held in the town of Loughborough; that is, his Marshall sat in judgment there upon all suits between members of the King's household and others, and such crimes as might be committed within the verge of the Court for the time being. Meanwhile the King himself [was] with his distinguished subject and Counsellor, Lord Beaumont, at his house at Beaumanor. The King hunted in Charnwood Forest, and probably in the Loughborough Parks, as yet unstocked with anything but game by needy and parsimonious graziers.

Upon one of these six days a street affray occurred in Leicester, and as it became a question of court etiquette to know whether Leicester might be considered within the limits of the King's Court, a jury from the neighbouring towns was empanelled to ascertain the fact. From Loughborough itself, John Church, Peter Toone, and Richard Cartwright, "men of most repute and substance," were chosen; from Hathern, Randolph Squirs, John Digby, and Richard Weston; from Cotes, John Russell, and Richard Cotes; and from Wymeswold, Simon Joyce, Richard Peale, and Edward Blount. The trial was held at Loughborough, and the witnesses came thither from Leicester before them. The crime of killing anyone within the precincts of a King's Court was usually a very heinous one, the punishment of which was more than ordinarily severe. There appears to have been in this case some doubt as to whether Leicester was really within the limits of the Court, and under the circumstances the jury, we believe, came to a very merciful conclusion in the matter.

Richard II appears to have been so well pleased with his visit to Beaumanor and the pleasantnesses of a forest probably new to him, that he paid a second visit to Lord Beaumont in two years afterwards, in 1390. This progress appears to have been one of enjoyment entirely. The Duke of Lancaster proclaimed a royal hunt at Leicester, and there was a large gathering of the "magnates of the King," says Knighton, writing from Leicester Abbey. These were the Archbishop of York, the Duke of York, the Duke of Gloucester, the Earl of Arundell, Lord John Holland, Earl of Huntington, with many other lords. That they must have hunted in Charnwood, Beaumanor, Loughborough Parks, and elsewhere, is very clear from the terms Knighton uses. The hunting was to be at Leicester, in the Forest, and the preserved enclosures or parks (defensa), and in all the lands thereabouts. It does not require much stretch of imagination either to conceive the fact or the wonderment it would create amongst the country people.

On the Thursday following the King moved towards Nottingham, and passed the night with Lord Beaumont at Beaumanor. It is singular that Knighton does not give the name of this place, but simply says, "He passed the night with the Lord of Beaumonde, near Lowteborowe." Unfortunately, there are no accounts of Royal progresses extant of so early a date, or we might have been able to have given more details concerning Richard II’s two visits to our neighbourhood, and his progresses through the town [5].

We have now to pass to a little episode in the religious history of the town. In his various perambulations through this country, the great Wickliffe [sic] had several times visited Loughborough, and preached here, and his bold yet reverent mien had won for him the good estimation of his hearers, if it had not secured their conviction. The church was like all others then; it had many images of the Saints for the people to pray to, but as yet there was no open Bible that they could read. The people were religious enough in their way, and do not seem to have been much moved by his exhortations. He found an able follower in William of Swynderby, or the Hermit, a man of unknown birth and origin, who lived in a cell in the woods outside the walls of Leicester, and issued thence to the neighbouring towns, reproving the fair sex for their gaieties, and the priests for their vices and place and money-hunting

He visited Loughborough several times, preaching from the market cross with all the fervour of an apostle. We do not know whether the fair sex here was as giddy and as finely dressed as in their county town, but if they were, they would most assuredly receive from him the same stern and stinging reproof. With his remarks upon the place and money-hunting vices of the clergy they could well agree, for although now without a recognised pastor, they had recently been familiar with two instances of pluralism in their midst.

In 1366, John de Leek not only held the living of St. Peter's [6], then taxed at 44 marks, but the prebend of Somerleye, in the Church of Chichester, taxed at twelve marks, and another in the free chapel of Windsor, taxed at 40 shillings. In the same year, also, John de Worshopp was complained of on the same ground, he holding the church of Loughborough, a canonary at Lincoln, and the Prebendary of Lowth taxed at 70 marks. Swynderby soon aroused an opposition strong enough to test the strength of his own mind and principle. He was cited, in 1389, to appear at Lincoln, and went, many of his friends going with him "some of whom were the most considerable of the inhabitants of Leicester." Three Friars were his accusers. Swynderby could not deny what he had done, but he showed the white feather and promised to do penance and recant. Our admiration of the man ceases from that moment, and we can only pity him and be as charitable with him as possible. Stephen de Syresham, vicar of Barrow, was to accompany him on his barefooted tour to the places at which he had preached. They came to Loughborough, and there, where he had taught so differently before, the poor crushed man stood up and read that memorable recantation of his:

"I, William Swinderby, priest, although unworthy of the Diocese of Lincoln, acknowledging one true Catholic and Apostolic faith of the holy church of Rome, do abjure all heresy and error repugning to the determination of the holy mother church, whereof I have hitherto been defamed; namely, the conclusions and articles above prefixed, and every one of them, to me judicially objected, by the commissary of the reverend father in Christ and Lord John, by the Grace of God, Bishop of Lincoln; and do revoke the same, and every one of them, some as heretical, some as erroneous and false; and do affirm and believe them to be so, and hereafter, will never teach, preach, or affirm publicly or privily the same. Neither will I make any sermon within the diocese of Lincoln, but asking first and obtaining the license of the aforesaid reverend father and lord, the Bishop of Lincoln. Contrary to the which, if I shall presume hereafter to say or do, to hold or preach, I shall be content to abide by the severity of the canon, as I have judicially, by the necessity of the law, sworn, and do swear, &c."

This appears to have been his last public act, and he who might have shone for ever as a lesser light beside the bright Morning Star of the Reformation, came crashing down to dull earth a charred and smouldering meteoroid, without even one bright streak across the heavens in his descent to make us think more kindly of him, and forgive him his traitorous humiliation.

In 1391, Richard II evinced the confidence he reposed in Lord Beaumont by selecting him as one of the ambassadors he sent to Paris to negotiate concerning his marriage with Isabella, the daughter of Charles of France. She had been previously betrothed to the son of the Duke of Brittain, and it required no little discrimination on the part of the ambassadors so to open their message as not to incense the King, her father, at the outset, and so frustrate the whole scheme. They were, however, treated everywhere with the greatest honour and respect.

They were lodged at the Croix du Tiroir in Paris, and their horses, six hundred in number, with the customary attendants on foot, amounting (according to the monk of St. Denis) to 1,200 persons, occupied the whole of that and part of another street. Three hundred crowns had been voted by the French to defray the expenses of this multitude during their stay in the city. A treaty was eventually signed agreeing to the marriage of Isabella to King Richard. Her dower was fixed at 80,000 crowns, and she was to be allowed when she had reached her twelfth year to dissent from the arrangement if she chose.

The Earl Marshall of England espoused her as proxy for the King, and from that time she became in name at least Queen of England. Although only in her eighth year, "it was a goodly sight to see her behaviour," says Froissart, "for all that she was but young, right pleasantly she bore the part of a queen." The real marriage which took place some years afterwards, it is no part of our story to give an account of; suffice it to say, that in Froissart as much as will satisfy any curious member of the sex so fond of such scenes and themes may be found for the seeking, and is very readable. This negotiation was Lord Beaumont's last public act, and he died in 1397.

All Saints with Holy Trinity

____________________________________

NOTES

[1] St Peter’s is the church we now refer to as All Saints with Holy Trinity

[2] A French-speaking poet and historian from the Low Countries

[3] Modern day known as Monção 

[4] Modern day known as Melgaço

[5] More information would be useful, as if the King were heading to Nottingham from Loughborough, Beaumanor is hardly on the way.

[6] All Saints with Holy Trinity

____________________________________

Transcribed and presented here with the kind permission of the British Newspaper Archive. https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/

____________________________________

Posted by lynneaboutloughborough

With apologies for typos which are all mine!

_______________________________________________

Thank you for reading this blog.

Copyright:

The copyright © of all content on this blog rests with me, however, you are welcome to quote passages from any of my posts, with appropriate credit. The correct citation for this looks as follows:

Dyer, Lynne (2025). Goadby’s History of Loughborough chapter 5 part 2. Available from: https://lynneaboutloughborough.blogspot.com/2025/12/goadbys-history-of-loughborough-chapter.html [Accessed 21 December 2025]

Take down policy:

I post no pictures that are not my own, unless I have express permission so to do. All text is my own, and not copied from any other information sources, printed or electronic, unless identified and credited as such. If you find I have posted something in contravention of these statements, or if there are photographs of you which you would prefer not to be here, please contact me at the address listed on the About Me page, and I will remove these.

External Links:

By including links to external sources I am not endorsing the websites, the authors, nor the information contained therein, and will not check back to update out-of-date links. Using these links to access external information is entirely the responsibility of the reader of the blog.

Blog archive and tags:

If you are viewing this blog in mobile format, you will not be able to easily access the blog archive, or the clickable links to various topics. These can be accessed if you scroll to the bottom of the page, and click 'View Web Version'. Alternatively, there is also a complete list of posts, which when clicked will take you to the page you are interested in.

Searching the blog:

You can search the blog using the dedicated search box that appears near the top of the blog when viewed in the web version. Alternatively, you can search using your usual search engine (e.g. Bing, Google, DuckDuckGo etc.) by following this example:

site: https://lynneaboutloughborough.blogspot.com/ “Radmoor House”

NOTE – the words you’re actually looking for must be in “” and the first of these must be preceded by a space

Thank you for reading this blog.

Lynne

Sunday, 14 December 2025

Goadby's History of Loughborough Chapter 5 Pt 1

We continue the story of Loughborough as presented as a serialisation by Edwin Goadby in 1864 Loughborough Monitor. Chapter 5 covers the Beaumont family, who were lords of the manor of Loughborough. As far as possible this transcription follows the layout of the original article, although I have inserted a few paragraph breaks, just to make it a bit easier to read.

As mentioned in previous posts, more of Loughborough's history has been uncovered since Goadby was writing in 1864, and language usage has also changed, so there will be facts that are wrong, and words we may no longer use today - reader, beware!!


THE HISTORY OF LOUGHBOROUGH TIME OF THE BRITONS TO THE MIDDLE OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY.

Chapter 5, Pt 1 The family of the Beaumonts, &c.

In: Loughborough Monitor 10 November 1864, pg 5

Part 1 - Origin of the Family - The First Lord Beaumont - His coming to England, dignities, marriage, and insult to King Edward II. - Takes the side of Isabella, and captures the King - Is presented with the Manor of Loughborough for this service by Edward III. – Banished - Previous Residence at Whitwick Castle and afterwards at Beaumanor - Cause and result of the Petition of Edmund, Earl of Kent - Returns, and invades Scotland - Capture and Ransom - Succeeded by his son John, Lord de Beaumont.

____________________________________

It ought, perhaps, to be a source of honest pride to the inhabitants of Loughborough, and in some way compensate for the occasional scarcity of local facts, that the town has been constantly in the possession of some of the noblest families of the land, so that its history becomes intimately connected with the history of the nation itself, and each is made more intelligible when viewed in its relations with the other. We have already seen it to be so in the case of the Earls of Chester and the Despensers, and while the tragic fate of the latter still saddens us with its reality, and the awful shadow of the scaffold is flung across our page, we repeat the watchword of another family - Erectus non elatus - unfurl its banner, and open the bead-roll of its history.

The family of the Beaumonts was of French origin, and of great antiquity. Its surname was derived from the city of Beaumont in France, and its noble members figure conspicuously in the annals of England and their own country. Two of the Lord Beaumonts took an active part in the crusade of St. Louis, King of France, in 1248, and one "Messire Jean de Beaumont" is mentioned as a knight of his household. The heiress of one of the Crusaders, Agnes, Viscountess of Beaumont and Mayne, brought the seigneury to her husband, Lewis de Brienne, the second son of Charles, King of Jerusalem and Sicily, and the nephew of Louis IX of France.

Sir Henry de Beaumont, the one with whose history we are immediately concerned, was the fourth son of this union, and came to England, as Dugdale, Burke, and others suppose [1], at the instance of his near relative, Eleanor of Castille, the wife of our Edward I. In the records of the time we find him styled consanguinis regis, and documents addressed by Edward II consanguineo nostro carissimo Henrico de Bellomont. When Edward I, by a combination of force and fraud, had obtained possession of Scotland, he made him Constable of Roxburgh Castle, and also King of the Isle of Man for life. Upon the accession of Edward II, the barony of Beaumont was conferred upon him, and in right of his marriage with Alice, heiress of Alexander, Earl of Buchan, then living at Whitwick, near Loughborough, he assumed that title also. He attended Edward II in his expedition into Scotland, fled with him from the fatal field of Bannockburn, June 24, 1314, and afterwards obtained the King’s precept granting him 200 marks (equivalent to about £140 of our present [1864] money) out of the fifteenths collected in Yorkshire, towards defraying his expenses during the campaign.

He was constantly summoned to the Parliament of Edward II, by special writ, for since the extinction of the Montfort rebellion the parliaments had been composed of such barons only as were so summoned, and it was considered a degrading insult not to be served with a king’s writ when it had hitherto been an invariable proceeding.

This notable Lord Beaumont appears to have been a man of a haughty, imperious disposition, for when the King held a special council at Bishopthorpe, near York, to consider the propriety of a treaty with Robert Bruce, he behaved himself in such a manner as to incur his Majesty’s severe displeasure. The King asked each one for his opinion and counsel, and asked Lord Beaumont in turn;

"hereupon the said Henry," we quote from the Close Rolls in the Tower, "with a certain intemperate motion or gesture, and in a spirit of disrespect, answered the King that he would not give counsel to him in this particular. The Lord King being disturbed at this answer, commanded the said Henry to depart from the council, and as he was going out he spoke as he had done before, and said that he was better pleased to be away from such a council than in it.”

He was then committed to prison for his contempt and disobedience, but several noblemen promising "to have him before the King in the same condition in which he now is when they may be summoned on that account," their bail was accepted, and he was set at liberty.

He afterwards regained the royal favour, and retained it until he took the side of Isabella of Hainault against him and the Spencers, and was, in fact, the person who delivered him up, with the younger Spencer, after their escape from Bristol. Froissart’s [2] account of this capture and the chase by sea is a piece of fanciful tradition, palmed upon his credulity by some designing or ignorant Englishman. The King was taken in Glamorganshire, and sent to Berkeley Castle, where he was inhumanly murdered. For this especial service the young King, Edward III, then only Duke of Lancaster, granted him the Manor of Loughborough, which he confirmed on his accession to the throne by a writ, dated Westminster, February 15, 1327. Lord Beaumont was banished the kingdom in 1328, for the active part he took in the confederacy against the Queen mother, and partly as a scapegoat for others, and lived in France again until 1332, according to Henry of Knighton, the old chronicler of Leicester Abbey.

Previous to his ostracism he lived at Whitwick Castle, which had been built by the Norman, Hugo de Grentesmaisnell, but appears to have somewhat decayed, since we find Lord Beaumont especially licensed to fortify it. The castle had been erected two centuries, and possibly this renovation could only be a temporary affair, since he soon afterwards moved to Beaumanor. The exact date of this change cannot be determined. Mr. Potter [3] thinks it was about 1330, but Lord Beaumont was yet in exile, and the manor was held for the King by John de Insula, and was, as we have seen, described in an inquisition made that year as "wasted by war" - viz. the feudal raid against the Spencers already detailed. The change must have been effected after 1332, and before 1340. He built a large mansion there, surrounded it with a moat, and enclosed a spacious park of many miles in circumference, which long continued to be called after him, according to the common spelling of the time, by the name of Beaumond Park.

In the grant of 1327 the different members of the Manor of Loughborough were not mentioned by name, and this oversight led to a suspicion in the mind of Edmund, Earl of Kent, to whom the King had definitely granted the other lands in the county of Leicester belonging to the late elder Spencer, that they had been unlawfully seized by Lord Beaumont. There was certainly a little ambiguity in the words used, but there could be no doubt as to the King's intention to include all its recognised members. However, in 1328, the Earl of Kent petitioned the King, in Norman-French, as follows:

"To our Lord the King, Edmund Earl of Kent sheweth that, whereas the same Lord King hath lately given to by him by his Charter all the lands and tenements which belonged to the elder Spencer, in the county of Leicester, except the manor of Loughborough, with the appurtenances thereof, which he had before given to Sir Henry de Beaumond; and whereas the said Henry hath come and claimed to himself the manors of Beaumanor, Ernesby, Hugglescote, Donnington, Barrow, Burton, Prestwould, Cotes, and Fritheby, which belong to the said Spencer, in the same county, and holdeth them as appurtenances to the said manor of Loughborough, whereas they do not appertain, and never have appertained to the said manor. Wherefore, the said Earl prayeth that a remedy may be ordained by the King and his Council, so that the gift which he hath made to the said Earl may take effect, to the profit of the same Earl."

The King answered: "Let a brief be made to Sir Henry de Beaumont, that he be, on a certain day, in the Chancery, with his Charter of Loughborough, to show then and there, and to answer to the King, why he hath entered upon the Manors, and that they are, notwithstanding, appurtenances to Loughborough, and to do and to receive then and there what the Court shall award."

This proceeding was doubtless gone through in the usual form, and the ambiguity of the terms "appurtenances, hamlets, and members" made apparent. A delay of some years, however, took place in the adjudication of the matter, owing to the absence of Lord Beaumont. The affair appears to have been settled in his favour, for the King re-granted the manor more explicitly, July 28, 1336, including several places that were not previously a part of it, and some even mentioned in the Earl of Kent's petition; as Walton, Barrow, Cossington, Ravenstone, Quorndon, Mount Sorrel, Woodthorpe and Knightesthorpe (sic), the two latter places being usually included under Beaumanor. The advowsons of Walton, Cossington, and Ravenstone were also expressly included.

The whole was said to be granted "in consideration of the many dangers encountered by the said Henry, as also of the great charges he had been at for the King's sake; also to make the more fully known his former princely intention, and to take away all ambiguity as to the promises for the future; and lastly, the better to provide for the security of the said Henry and Alice their heirs." The manor of Whitwick was also the property of Lord Beaumont, including, as its members, Sheepshed, Markfield, “Wydington, Rokeby, Newton, and Botharaton," so that his Leicestershire possessions were both extensive and valuable.

In 1332 the banished Lord returned, joined other notable Lords in the invasion of Scotland, making Baliol their general, and ostensibly warring to support his claim to the Scottish throne. But he had a strong personal object in making the campaign. The Earldom of Buchan had been lost to him by the revolutions that had taken place, and he sought to win it back again. This is very apparent according to Hardyng's rhymed chronicler [4], which says:

"Sir Henry Beaumont also went that while

His heritage to gett and to conquere;

Th'erledome of Boughan should bee his clere (lot)."

In 1334 he was besieged in the Castle of Dundarg, and for want of assistance he was obliged to surrender, and was made prisoner. A large ransom was fixed upon him, which appears to have been paid by Edward III, his sovereign, since, according to Tyrrell [5] (who quotes from a Patent Roll we have not been able to verify), a year afterwards the King cancelled all his debts that were due to the public exchequer as a requital for his services. He died in 1340, leaving his son John, who was then twenty-two, to be his heir.

This second Lord Beaumont married Alianore, fifth daughter of Henry, Earl of Lancaster, and was sent on a public expedition to Flanders in 1338. This year was one sure to be remembered by the farmers and wool merchants of Loughborough, since by decree of Parliament they were bound to make over for the King’s use one half of their summer’s wool, whilst he unceremoniously seized all belonging to the clergy, and made them pay nine marks (£10 of modern [1864] money) for every sack they had of him. Such a curious way of levying taxes was then common, but must have been extremely unpleasant. For instance, two years before this wool tax, the inhabitants of the town had to pay the King a taillage [6] of one-tenth of all their moveables, and if a list of their names and contributions had but been extant, we might have had a very fair picture suggested to us of the wealth and occupations of its principal persons.

The year his father died, the second Lord Beaumont was residing in Brabant, his lady waiting upon Queen Phillippa, and here his son Henry was born, for whom he subsequently obtained the King's letters patent, to the effect that his being born there should not hinder his inheriting his father's estates in England. He died in 1342.

The 'new' Beaumanor Hall built around 1845

____________________________________

NOTES

[1] This is probably a reference to William Dugdale (1605-1868), an English historian who specialised in the study of Mediaeval history, and probably to a ‘History of England’, a series of works written by philosopher, economist, and historian David Hume (1711-1776)

[2] A French-speaking poet and historian from the Low Countries

[3] A reference perhaps to Thomas Rossell Potter (1799-1873), who wrote ‘History and Antiquities of Charnwood Forest’, published in 1842.

[4] Probably John Hardyng (or Harding; 1378–1465) who was an English chronicler, born in the north of England. 

[5] This probably refers to James Tyrrell (5 May 1642 – 17 June 1718) who was an English author, Whig political philosopher, and historian.

[6] Taillage was a type of land tax

____________________________________

Transcribed and presented here with the kind permission of the British Newspaper Archive. https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/

____________________________________

Posted by lynneaboutloughborough

With apologies for typos which are all mine!

_______________________________________________

Thank you for reading this blog.

Copyright:

The copyright © of all content on this blog rests with me, however, you are welcome to quote passages from any of my posts, with appropriate credit. The correct citation for this looks as follows:

Dyer, Lynne (2025). Goadby's History of Loughborough Chapter 5 Pt 1. Available from: https://lynneaboutloughborough.blogspot.com/2025/12/goadbys-history-of-loughborough-chapter.html  [Accessed 14 December 2025]

Take down policy:

I post no pictures that are not my own, unless I have express permission so to do. All text is my own, and not copied from any other information sources, printed or electronic, unless identified and credited as such. If you find I have posted something in contravention of these statements, or if there are photographs of you which you would prefer not to be here, please contact me at the address listed on the About Me page, and I will remove these.

External Links:

By including links to external sources I am not endorsing the websites, the authors, nor the information contained therein, and will not check back to update out-of-date links. Using these links to access external information is entirely the responsibility of the reader of the blog.

Blog archive and tags:

If you are viewing this blog in mobile format, you will not be able to easily access the blog archive, or the clickable links to various topics. These can be accessed if you scroll to the bottom of the page, and click 'View Web Version'. Alternatively, there is also a complete list of posts, which when clicked will take you to the page you are interested in.

Searching the blog:

You can search the blog using the dedicated search box that appears near the top of the blog when viewed in the web version. Alternatively, you can search using your usual search engine (e.g. Bing, Google, DuckDuckGo etc.) by following this example:

site: https://lynneaboutloughborough.blogspot.com/ “Radmoor House”

NOTE – the words you’re actually looking for must be in “” and the first of these must be preceded by a space

Thank you for reading this blog.

Lynne